Radiometric dating of the siloam tunnel jerusalem

This recasting of the scientific method throws suspicion on entire disciplines of science, including the work of radiometric dating.

Of course, the recent Gospel of Jesus Wife Papyrus forgery should also be instructive for all in the field. Furthermore, Israel Finkelstein, Eric Cline, Benjamin Porter, and Felix Höflmayer have all drawn my attention to the fact that the “Hallstatt Plateau” is arguably to be factored in here…namely, according to the “Hallstatt Plateau,” radiocarbon dates of ca.

On a different note, it should also be emphasized that we have many Old Hebrew inscriptions from First Temple Period Jerusalem, some of them particularly famous and especially important, such as the Siloam Tunnel Inscription, the Royal Steward Inscription (with N. 2450 BP (Before Present = 1950) consistently calibrate to ca.

The site is in the Jordan valley of Israel, where successive settlements rose and fell over the centuries.

Using highly sophisticated techniques for establishing dates through the decay rate of radioactive carbon, the scientists have pinned down the time of a disputed moment in history, recorded in the Bible, when a Pharaoh now known as Shoshenq I invaded Jerusalem.

This belief necessitates a reinterpretation of a vast amount of data into a highly compressed timeframe.

The operations of carbon-14 dating rest on the same basic assumptions about the natural world as the scientific method; namely, that reality is objective and consistent, that humans have the ability to perceive reality correctly, and that information about the world can be studied and known.Des relevés à la main furent esquissés mais le travail le plus sérieux, encore utile aujourd’hui, est le nettoyage, l’estampage et le moulage réalisés par Charles Clermont-Ganneau .Un particulier, informé de la découverte, tenta ensuite d’extraire l’inscription de la paroi rocheuse, la brisant en plusieurs fragments, dans l’espoir de la vendre à un musée européen. I have also had some time to spend with a very fine high resolution image of the inscription. In the media discussions of the Jerusalem Papyrus, there have been many references to an assumed secure 7th century carbon date for the papyrus…this is too narrow…as it is without a stated plus and minus range. As the papyrus continues to garner attention, it is perhaps useful to convey certain additional reflections, especially with the release of the editio princeps (i.e., I have now received a copy of it and so can augment some of my reflections). ______ (1) Carbon dates normally, of course, have a plus and minus range.This method also assumes that experiments should be repeatable regardless of one’s worldview. However, the young-earth approach undermines many of these assumptions.

Comments are closed.